|
|
| ProDiGaL |
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
why do u think France and Russia wont get involved??...hhhmmm could it because they risk to lose billions in oil revenue?...dont try and act like America is the only one with its own ajenda...
I am sure oil is a part of the war...however it is not the only reason...i mean if we really wanted to oil we would never of left in 1991...u ever think about that??....not too mention we get very little oil from Iraq...the oil revenue will help rebuild Iraq for its people when they are finally free..... |
maybe but they arent killing people for it... yeah its all about the people and helping them.... i wonder when and if the N.korean people will get helped....and your right oil isnt the only part, there are many other factors, trying out new toys in the field, justifying the huge defence budget, distrating people from domestic issues, win a war and claim you saved the free world, get re-electded....... |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by ProDiGaL
maybe but they arent killing people for it... yeah its all about the people and helping them.... i wonder when and if the N.korean people will get helped....and your right oil isnt the only part, there are many other factors, trying out new toys in the field, justifying the huge defence budget, distrating people from domestic issues, win a war and claim you saved the free world, get re-electded....... |
lol |
|
|
| RmB |
| well maybe Mr.Bush should just listen some nice uplifting trance and just relax :) |
|
|
| Robert |
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
I am sure oil is a part of the war...however it is not the only reason...i mean if we really wanted to oil we would never of left in 1991...u ever think about that?? |
in 1991 the mission was to free kuwait, not to get rid of saddam. alltho the US/UK wanted to go all the way and get rid of him, all the other coalition members backed down.
| quote: | Originally posted by Muff2K
France said today that they WILL become involved if there is checmical weapons use by Iraq in this war. |
it will be a little late then, won't it??
whatever the case, bush/blair cannot lose.
if he uses nbc-weapons, they can say 'look he has them and uses them'.
if he doesn't they will find them anyway.
and if they don't find any weapons whatsoever, they'll say he wasn't cooperating enough with the UN anyway.
either way, saddam is doomed. |
|
|
| DJ RozzeR |
| War will definatley happen in the next 24 hours for certain, most of the troops are at the borders waiting to enter the border and cannot wait any longer due to supplies, according to FBI Intelligentent sources Saddam has moved most of his firepower into bagdad inc the Scud Missles, Iraq has a very different community structure to ours and americans , he is the leader , Sadam Huesin is Iraq, They is no goverment there is no freedom he runs everything , and he likes to keep his country and his people protected from allies invading e.g America, and Britain etc, His people will back him and so wil lhis millatry , His two sons are inchard of most the armies and a spokes person for his son said that the " The mothers of the American soldiers will be crying Blood ' They think its like a picnic' . Iraq will use Nerve Agents and Mustad Gas , causing fighting conditions very bad for troops. Saddam and his sons have denied Exile that Preisdent bush has spelled them to leave the country in 48 hours, they have said they will fight any opposing force with a bloody battle and it appears this will be the case very soon. !!! |
|
|
| Robert |
| most if his army will surrender instantly. they are poorly equipped and are not willing to die for saddam. only the republican guard will try to make a stand. |
|
|
| djSlain |
| many iraqi fighters have already tried to surrender. but the US could not take them as prisoners of war since the war hasn't even started. they simply disarmed them and sent them back. |
|
|
| DJ El Kay Dee |
wow..i feel sorry for most of u who have posted here....how naive can u people be???
i would love to hear a justification for Bush's actions
over the past decade,asfar as my brain remembers, the US has done the following:
1. Kosovo. bombed the out of it, killed thousands of helpless civilians and "rebuilt" it
2. Afghanistan. Bombed the out of that too, killed thousansd of civilians and some canadian privates and "rebuilt" it
3. Now Iraq. same strategy.(only predictions here however)
hmm whats common in all these scenarios??
1. each of the locations are in prime locations in each continent.
-Kosovo is close to turkey, Poland, Greece, and pretty close to russia
-Afghanistan is neighboring pakistan and is close to India
-Iraq...take a wild guess....the heart of the middle east
2. milions spent on bombing the out of it, other countries feel sorry and help in rebuilding the bombed land thanks to the humanitarian state US puts it in.
3. US comes on top showing that they have rebuilt a better place when in reality, there is NO difference
4. Puppets of the US put in leadership of the country
5. US army bases set up in those locations for easier access to other countries that may spark an uproar agaisnt them.
heres the final question.
If an army is labeled "country X"'s army, why should there be bases set up in other countries?? |
|
|
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
tranceaddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room
|
