|
|
| Tranex02 |
ok....there are obviously too many stupid posts here.....:D
How about we use the 'political discussions' thread! Then maybe some of you might learn a little bit more, see other sides of the discussion, and then post something worth reading....;)
:) |
|
|
| smallSHEEP |
I don't know why the French of all people are taking the route they are. I can understand Germany or Russia, China etc Protesting but France.
They have been invaded by Germany twice in the last 100 years. They should realise that appeasment doesn't work.
And to think that we helped to liberate them twice. :rolleyes:
Also, they have decided to let Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe attend the Arica Nations in France when they knew there was a travel order banning him from doing so ending Just days before. This was done just to infuriate the English.
In addition, The French have been most undiplomatic about the whole immigration issue and the closing of the refugee camp at Sangatte.
Why oh why are the French such a pain :conf: |
|
|
| TranceGiant |
| quote: | Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Newsflash, France didn't call for a veto, simply because the US didn't even bring the matter to the security council, therefore there was nothing France could put a veto on. |
NEWSFLASH: On Friday (2 days before the summit at the Azores) Chirac openly said that he would veto ANY new resolution proposed by the US and Britian, NO MATTER WHAT THE CICUMSTANCES. This is a fact. Why should the US be bothered to go through this procedure then? France is hypocirtical. France amongst other countires ed this whole process of disarmament up. Totally.
You cannot pass a resolution which basically says "this is your last chance, if u dont comply face consequences" and then, when there is a clear breach, step back and say "lets wait and see".
that |
|
|
| Rhythm |
| quote: | Originally posted by TranceGiant
NEWSFLASH: On Friday (2 days before the summit at the Azores) Chirac openly said that he would veto ANY new resolution proposed by the US and Britian, NO MATTER WHAT THE CICUMSTANCES. This is a fact. Why should the US be bothered to go through this procedure then? France is hypocirtical. France amongst other countires ed this whole process of disarmament up. Totally.
You cannot pass a resolution which basically says "this is your last chance, if u dont comply face consequences" and then, when there is a clear breach, step back and say "lets wait and see".
that |
w3rd... sayin' "this is ur last chance" and ignoring that claim when the time comes is WEAK. |
|
|
| tranceaholic |
| quote: | Originally posted by HardTrance81
WE ARE IN DEBT BECAUSE WE HAVE LENDED ALL OUR ING CASH TO EVERY ONE IN THE WORLD AND NO ONE HAS PAID US BACK!!!!!!
We owe the money to ourselves... nt any othe country... if you CAN READ why dont you look it up on the net and it will tell you where the money comes from and where it is spent....! THINK god damn it.... THINK!!!!!! |
you do that much of the money goes to israel..like billions of dollars each year..and offcourse they never pay back..my predictions are we wont get sadam..lots of money and life will be lost on the war..forign relations will be screwed..IS IT WORTH IT? |
|
|
| smallSHEEP |
| quote: | Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Newsflash, France didn't call for a veto, simply because the US didn't even bring the matter to the security council, therefore there was nothing France could put a veto on. |
France threatened to veto any motion that the US/UK put foward (whatever it might say)
In effect it's worse than a veto because it's being used as a political tool. Something that doesn't promote democracy. |
|
|
| DrUg_Tit0 |
| quote: | NEWSFLASH: On Friday (2 days before the summit at the Azores) Chirac openly said that he would veto ANY new resolution proposed by the US and Britian, NO MATTER WHAT THE CICUMSTANCES. This is a fact. Why should the US be bothered to go through this procedure then? France is hypocirtical. France amongst other countires ed this whole process of disarmament up. Totally.
You cannot pass a resolution which basically says "this is your last chance, if u dont comply face consequences" and then, when there is a clear breach, step back and say "lets wait and see".
that |
It is different thing to say something and to actually do it. And don't blame it all on france, Russia and China would have most probably vetoed it also, and US would hardly get 9/16 votes from the security council. But regardless of that, doesn't anybody see it's odd that the US is breaching UN resolutions as a response to the Iraqi breach of a UN resolution?
And btw, disarmament process isn't a process that is finished in 2 days. It takes at least several months to disarm a country. Besides, I don't see how France screwed up weapons inspections when it asked, together with Germany to triple the amount of the inspectors in Iraq. And guess which country put a veto on that decision. Why, it was the US, surprise, surprise. So much for who screwed up the inspections. Also a reminder, the first inspections which ended in 1998 were canceled by Bill Clinton. That is, if weapons of which the country should be disarmed of exist, which has not been proven.
PS, go arguing on the political forum about matters like this, that's why it exist, right? |
|
|
| tiesto14 |
Tell this little boy that he is safe from terror...then i will be against ANY war on terrorism or countries with WMD....He lost his dad in 9.11
 |
|
|
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
tranceaddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room
|
