|
Samsung laughs at your 1080p HDTV
|
View this Thread in Original format
| jeeper_095 |
| quote: | Los Angeles (CA) – Samsung draws attention at this year’s Society for Information Display (SID) International Symposium with a 82” Quad HDTV that offers four times the resolution of today’s 1080p high definition TVs.

The prototype display has a massive 82” size and features a resolution of 3820x2160 pixels, which results in a total screen resolution of 8.3 megapixels. Current 1080p TVs run at 1920x1080 pixels or 2.1 megapixels. According to the manufacturer, the TV integrates a red/green/blue LED backlight, which raises the color saturation to 150%. The image refresh rate is 120 Hz.
What makes this screen especially interesting is the fact that Sang Soo Kim, executive vice president of the LCD Technology Center at Samsung Electronics, called it the “optimal display for future TVs.” Quad HDTVs have been available before, but were exclusively marketed to markets that have a need for high resolution image display – such as the oil and gas industries. For example, Westinghouse has been offering 2160p TVs with sizes up to 52”.
The Westinghouse Quad HDTV is not sold on the open market, but our sources say that you won’t be able to buy one for less than $40,000 at this time. So we don’t even ask how much that 82” 2160p TV could cost and wait until we win the lottery first.
Samsung said that it will have a few other products to show at its SID show booth, including an 82” e-board with a “multi-touchscreen” that could replace whiteboards and beam projectors, the company believes, as well as its previously announced 15” blue-phase LCD and a foldable 2.3” e-paper display.
SID 2008 runs from May 18 to 23 in Los Angeles. |
SOURCE |
|
|
| Darkarbiter |
| Who wants a crappy lcd anyway. Laser tvs ftw. |
|
|
| Zeiter |
| and im sure we wont be able to buy that kind of tv before 10 years..+ tv stations can't even handle 1080p lol |
|
|
| _Nut_ |
| What if Samsung made the 1080p LCD that I have? |
|
|
| nchs09 |
I want an hd tv:mad:
sadly the only channel i really watch (fox sports en espanol) broadcasts in the worst quality ever. |
|
|
| SuspicionVandit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Darkarbiter
Who wants a crappy lcd anyway. Laser tvs ftw. |
who wants a crappy laser TV? Jesus TVs ftw. |
|
|
| bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
I want an hd tv:mad:
sadly the only channel i really watch (fox sports en espanol) broadcasts in the worst quality ever. |
Sad but true, FSN barely broadcasts ANY games in HD...a few college games that's about it. I believe the entire college football this season will be in HD though. We're making progress slowly, half the operators out there are ing morons and don't know how to use the HD machines. Idiots. The stuff on FOX (MLB and NFL) are usually HD though, so...I guess that's good :/ |
|
|
| beema |
I receive HD signals straight to my brain, I just have to close my eyes and flip a tiny switch located near my second bicuspid.
It owns all of you and your primitive "TV's"
losers
get with the program |
|
|
| woscar99 |
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
I want an hd tv:mad:
sadly the only channel i really watch (fox sports en espanol) broadcasts in the worst quality ever. |
Why the do you watch that ? Worst sports channel EVER! |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by woscar99
Why the do you watch that ? Worst sports channel EVER! | because they show "resumenes" of futbol in guatemala, plus show alot of games of boca juniors and the argentia leauge in general with resumenes and la copa libertadores. |
|
|
| AustralianGQ |
| impressive but impractical for any current use. im still tryna save up for a 42 or 46" lcd for my room and i already want oled but cant afford that anytime soon lol. |
|
|
|
|