|
This forum could quite possibly contain the biggest amount of stupid people
|
View this Thread in Original format
| zabrak |
This forum could quite possibly contain the biggest amount of stupid people gathered in one place when compared to any other forum on the internet.
Honestly, I was reading through THIS TOPIC and I could only make it to like the 4th or 5th page - by the time I made it to that page of the thread I felt like a blood vessel was about to explode. I don't know if you guys choose to be ignorant, or it's plausible to state that that generally all the posters here are generally around the age of 12.
"Nobody cares about old music anymore" are some comments that I've been hearing lately. Oh really, is that why The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, and Pink Floyd continue to sell well today? Let's put it this way, released less than eight years ago, The Beatles' greatest hists album "1" (a very decent album by the way) sold almost 30 million copies. Led Zeppelin's one-off reunion managed to get
:eyes: ONE MILLION :eyes: people to register for tickets, easily making it the biggest concert by any single band in history.
Also let'ls make things clear, I could go on and on about Zeppelin and Floyd and how their constantly being influenced left and right today - especially Led Zeppelin, but I'll focus on The Beatles to end this rant.
The Beatles are widely accepted, regarded, cited as, put as, accepted, and any other word I could use as the greatest band in history. Also...And this is an objective, unarguable fact, they're the most important, influential, revolutionary, and groundbreaking band in history. STILL relevant today, still constnatly being cited left and right in popular culture....Do you think a Trance artist that came out today will still be important more than 40 years after they formed?
EDIT: By the way, I have over 100 hours of Trance on my computer...I love Trance and all, and I'm also not telling you guys to worship classic rock...I'm just saying get your facts straight or don't be so ignorant towards The Beatles, etc. when making claimes about them. |
|
|
| zabrak |
I'm going to post a quick reply..Not to bump my own thread or anything, but just to make sure you guys read this:
By the way, I have over 100 hours of Trance on my computer...I love Trance and all, and I'm also not telling you guys to worship classic rock...I'm just saying get your facts straight or don't be so ignorant towards The Beatles, etc. when making claimes about them. |
|
|
| Ted Promo |
...and you're on this forum so that means...
oh, wait. |
|
|
| SuspicionVandit |
It took 4 men to write a masterpiece?
Pfft. Tiesto and Johann Sebastian Bach are 1 man legends. |
|
|
| hkaliher |
assuming we are all morons, why are you trying to convince us of anything?
we are stupid, you are super smart and should leave
i am going to write on my wall in and then try to force the square peg in the round hole for a while |
|
|
| Redd |
| Wow, my head hurts after reading that. Gz! |
|
|
| Swamper |
| quote: | Originally posted by zabrak
This forum could quite possibly contain the biggest amount of stupid people gathered in one place when compared to any other forum on the internet. |
Great way to start your first thread.
| quote: | | don't know if you guys choose to be ignorant, or it's plausible to state that that generally all the posters here are generally around the age of 12. |
Well, it's always 'plausible' to 'state' something. However, I'm not sure it's plausible for the rest of your sentence to achieve coherence: 'to state that that generally all the posters here are generally around the age of 12'. Oh, I get it, that's your way to show us how a 12 year old writes. Clever! :stongue:
You also proudly state you did not read the whole thread -- it shows, for if you did you would see others siding with your argument.
| quote: | | The Beatles are widely accepted, regarded, cited as, put as, accepted, and any other word I could use as the greatest band in history. Also...And this is an objective, unarguable fact, they're the most important, influential, revolutionary, and groundbreaking band in history. |
For starters, 'influential/revolutionary/groundbreaking' are all adjectives you use describing The Beatles -- while this is your opinion, and those of many others, it doesn't constitute an 'unarguable fact' nor is it 'objective'. For, if it were possible for an opinion to be an 'unarguable fact' you wouldn't need to state it was 'widely accepted' -- it would, by its very definition, have to be completely accepted.
And as a final touch, let's not forget we have you bumping your thread within 6 minutes of posting. :rolleyes: |
|
|
| zabrak |
Well, it's always 'plausible' to 'state' something. However, I'm not sure it's possible for the rest of your sentence to achieve coherence 'to state that that generally all the posters here are generally around the age of 12'. Oh, I get it, that's your way to show us how a 12 year old writes. Clever!
Right...It's plausible to state my assumption...How can you not understand it?
For starters, 'influential/revolutionary/groundbreaking' are all adjectives you use describing The Beatles -- while this is your opinion, and those of many others, it doesn't constitute an 'unarguable fact' nor is it 'objective'. For, if it were possible for an opinion to be an 'unarguable fact' you wouldn't need to state it was 'widely accepted' -- it would, by its very definition, have to be completely accepted.
Actually no, it is an undisputable fact that the beatles are the most revolutionary, influential, yadda yadda band of all time. It's not a subjective opninion, buddy. I can't just CHOOSE for the beatles to not be influential, oh god your logic is so horrendouse it makes me laugh. |
|
|
|
|
