|
|
| DaveBegic |
| well naturally, lieb, and even mike writes some highly percussive but im talking about the new wave of "tech trance artists" like katana and norman |
|
|
| escee |
if I want techno Ill listen to a techno set.
if I want trance Ill listen to a trance set.
if I want progressive Ill listen to a progressive set.
if I want electro Ill cut my ing ears off.
My point is that listening to quasi sub genres will never be as good as the full thing. There are usually a few tracks at the start of the genre which are acceptable cross overs (lethal industry? a few of the electro prog tracks which came out early-mid last year) and make the sound popular. But then others try to build off of their popularity, and fail (at sounding as good as the first few), but still seem to get played.
In summation, TeK TRaNcE SuCkS. |
|
|
| [ groovypants ] |
| I like to classify people like DJ Preach, Michael de Hey, Dimitri Andreas, and to some extent Picotto, etc. in the style of Dutch Techno - where the sound isnt so dirty and the texture is much more thinner/tight. :eek: :wtf: |
|
|
| Light The Fuse |
| luvin it:) |
|
|
| tachyon |
| quote: | Originally quoted by tachyon
"It's not tech trance, its techy trance!!" :toothless
|
:thepirate |
|
|
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
tranceaddict Forums Archive > Local Scene Info / Discussion > Australia
|
