|
The Scott Peterson Case
|
View this Thread in Original format
| St_Andrew |
Wtf, i dont get it, they dont really have any proof and still he is convicted for murder :conf:
and why is there such a fuss about this case :conf:
edit:
hehe found loads of websites to support my case:
| quote: | On December 24, 2002 Laci Peterson disappeared from her home in Modesto, California. Less than one hour after her disappearance, her husband Scott Peterson became the major focus of the investigation. Over the next year, 300 law enforcement officers, 98 public agencies, $4 million dollars and more than 30,000 man hours were spent attempting to prove that Scott Peterson killed his wife and unborn son. At the end of the investigation, not one person could produce any evidence as to when, where, how and, most importantly, why Scott Peterson murdered his wife.
The case of the People v. Scott Peterson began on June 1, 2004. The six months of testimony included over 180 witnesses as well as a number of revolving prosecution theories designed to fit the ever changing stories of prosecution witnesses. After six months, there was still not one credible theory advanced as to when, where, how or why Scott would murder Laci. |
http://www.petersoninvestigation.com
http://www.scottisinnocent.com/
http://www.geocities.com/justicewell/scott.htm
http://www.hollywoodinvestigator.com/2004/peterson.htm
oh well, you get the point, its seriously pissing me off.. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| There was plenty of proof to convict him or do you require an eye witness to view the actual murder? :conf: |
|
|
| St_Andrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by igottaknow
There was plenty of proof to convict him or do you require an eye witness to view the actual murder? :conf: |
no there is not. There is no evidence whatsoever that he actually killed her. If there is show it to me. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| quote: | Originally posted by St_Andrew
no there is not. There is no evidence whatsoever that he actually killed her. If there is show it to me. |
you're right he is innocent, they should release him so he can join OJ on the golf course in search of the "real" killers. :rolleyes: |
|
|
| St_Andrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by igottaknow
you're right he is innocent, they should release him so he can join OJ on the golf course in search of the "real" killers. :rolleyes: |
well, show me some proof then. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| quote: | Originally posted by St_Andrew
well, show me some proof then. |
sorry, no proof for you! |
|
|
| St_Andrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by igottaknow
sorry, no proof for you! |
No real proof for anyone... |
|
|
| wolverine16 |
| There was no hard evidence, only circumstantial. I think he probably did it, but I didn't think he'd be found guilty only based on circumstantial evidence, let alone the death penalty. The media seemed to focus on this because it was a good looking couple from the suburbs and the victim was pregnant. The coverage probably had something to do with the outcome. Horrible that it happened, but ridiculous how much coverage it got when many important stories got none. It all has to do with the entertainment aspect of the news to try to draw ratings. |
|
|
| St_Andrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by wolverine16
There was no hard evidence, only circumstantial. I think he probably did it, but I didn't think he'd be found guilty only based on circumstantial evidence, let alone the death penalty. The media seemed to focus on this because it was a good looking couple from the suburbs and the victim was pregnant. The coverage probably had something to do with the outcome. Horrible that it happened, but ridiculous how much coverage it got when many important stories got none. It all has to do with the entertainment aspect of the news to try to draw ratings. |
I totally agree with your post!
i also updated my first post a litle bit.
Edit:
Im not *that* sure he did it tho. Although chances are that he did it. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
^--- proof shmoof. i want "real" proof :rolleyes:
thx occ i couldn't be bothered to look up the obvious, but i think st andrew links are more creditble "http://www.scottisinnocent.com". :disbelief |
|
|
| Shakka |
| The Boogeyman did it! |
|
|
|
|
