return to tranceaddict tranceaddict Forums Archive > Other > Gaming Forum
Pages: [1] 2 3 
Battlefield or Call of Duty
 
djSlain
war?

Battlfield is pretty fun, especially DC. However, it runs very poorly on my system with the GeForce 4 MX 440. It's fun, but my experience might be ruined with the performance. i love multiplayer btw.
Call of Duty is INTENSE, as a single player game. I haven't heard anything about multiplayer and i hear it's short. it also runs very smoothly on my comp. might be a great gaming experience.

i don't think i should wait for BF:Vietnam 'cus i think it would run like on this system
Matt Jay
quote:
Originally posted by djSlain
war?

Battlfield is pretty fun, especially DC. However, it runs very poorly on my system with the GeForce 4 MX 440. It's fun, but my experience might be ruined with the performance. i love multiplayer btw.
Call of Duty is INTENSE, as a single player game. I haven't heard anything about multiplayer and i hear it's short. it also runs very smoothly on my comp. might be a great gaming experience.

i don't think i should wait for BF:Vietnam 'cus i think it would run like on this system



Theres nothing like playing CoD on server with 40 other ppl in Team Deathmatch. :eyespop:

It's quite hard to camp as someone will always kill you from behind :P

Single player is short but very intense.
ThaDevil
Battlefield 1942 is not in the same league as Call Of Duty.
rizen
BF1942 atm for me :)
smoorhs
I say CoD MP for sure! :D
Hard_NRG
tough choice but COD gets my vote
ga11agher
call of duty - hands down
nrjizer
CoD > regular BF

however EoD > CoD imo, because the maps are so large and well done, its a lot of fun sneaking through the bushes and popping someone off.

CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
tranceaddict Forums Archive > Other > Gaming Forum

Powered by: vB
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Privacy Statement