 |
|
|
|
 |
Raptor
steve_k

Registered: Nov 2000
Location: L.A,Glasgow,Hong Kong
|
|
|
Nov-19-2002 20:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Eu4ea
sticky, sweaty, hot

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Cobalt
Progressive Trance!
Progressive trance is my favorite breed of electronica. The genre includes tracks that are too progressive to be labeled trance, too melodic to be progressive house, and too deep to classify as tech-trance.
Here are some artists that I feel exemplify the progressive trance style:
Tilt
Natious
Mara
Space Manoeuvres
James Holden
Junkie XL
Breeder
Three Drives
Cass & Slide
Way Out West
For DJs, look no further than Christopher Lawrence.
Others include John OO Flemming, Nick Warren, Max Graham, and D:Fuse.
Sasha mainly had this style in his late 99 - early 2000 days, too. Look for some of his earlier sets. Dave Seaman started out pretty progressive-trance too, but one look at GU Melbourne will indicate he doesn't really spin that anymore.
Glad you asked. |
aren't most of these Progressive HOUSE?
___________________
giggidy giggidy!
|
|
Nov-20-2002 01:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Raptor
steve_k

Registered: Nov 2000
Location: L.A,Glasgow,Hong Kong
|
|
|
Nov-20-2002 01:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
trance_is_it
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Canada
|
|
|
I know what the difference is but I can't explain it anymore difference than many people have already did, what I do want to say is that, pay no attention to bias people who thinks that ******* is shitty,sucks,boring,crap etc, or if #*#*#* is the best,kicks ass,great,#1 etc, why don't these people just listen to what they like and leave it at that, instead of putting down other styles any change they get for any good reasons, it's just very childish, if we all do this we would be arguing all the time about what style is better and what's not, instead of talking about what's a good or bad Dj/producers/songs with good reasons and not with bias opinions.
___________________
WORD TO THE MOTHER!
|
|
Nov-20-2002 02:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
nennon
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Miami
|
|
|
Good lord..
Ahh not this crap again..
We had a discussion on another forum about this.. There is no such thing as Progressive Trance, at least that label is COMPLETELY WRONG for the people Cobalt listed above. Either you're denying that you like progressive HOUSE, or you are just misinformed. Ask Mara what they call their music, and you won't get a word "trance" anywhere NEAR their reply.
And what's this about "progressive trance being more melodic than house".. are you nuts? You're separating the genre into melodic and non-melodic and assigning different labels to it? If a song sounds like Xpander, its "progressive trance" just because it has melody?
Trance is trance, progressive house is progressive house.. Don't mix the two together, and try to understand that they are DIFFERENT - the vibe, the BPM, the people who produce it are very different. I don't consider anything to be trance if it's below 132 bpm. Simple as that, trance is defined by it's speed more than its synths, melodies, or anything else.
If you're gonna start a new genre, at least label the artists properly. James Holden is not a trance producer :-P
|
|
Nov-20-2002 04:41
|
|
|
 |
 |
nennon
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Miami
|
|
|
Here's a challenge for you, name one trance song or remix under 132 bpm. As I told Amit, there are some 130's that come close, but even they are progressive HOUSE, not any sub-genre of trance.
I can't believe you guys listen to this music, and can't even label it properly.
|
|
Nov-20-2002 04:51
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:54.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|