...and set aside a part of your computer for write access and leave the OS in a virgin state. There is an insane amount of software out there with backdoors and other shit that gets silently installed. Sad but true.
___________________
"In a world of illusion you only see what you feel"
May-28-2012 07:15
itsamemario
Superior tranceadict
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Mushroom Kingdom
quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
If you really want to bulletproof your computer you should consider Deep Freeze
...and set aside a part of your computer for write access and leave the OS in a virgin state. There is an insane amount of software out there with backdoors and other shit that gets silently installed. Sad but true.
I've hacked those before. It's not that hard, you just need to bypass the electrical lock gates and the NAT controller and yoǘre basically in. Although you'll need to some filing and fluttering once you're in, but it's definitely crackable.
Originally posted by dj_alfi
Yah I'm not telling you how to do it. Not that I even know myself. But think of it like a Flux Capacitor for your WiFi. At regular internetting it works just like a normal network interface, but when that baby hits 88 mbps you're gonna see some serious cp.
wat? Boosting one's wifi or something?
quote:
Yah I'm not telling you how to do it.
don' wanna know how to either way
May-30-2012 22:22
Joss Weatherby
terrible silence
Registered: May 2008
Location: Whole Life Tour | Cascadia
quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
yeah but has no bearing on the subject whatsoever. when you're running it through tor it's gonna be easily identifiable as tor data.
No, encrypted tor data looks like any other encrypted data from any other source. Tor is just a specific routing network. Its not tor is adding anything unique to the header of a packet, beyond an IP address that just happens to be another tor node. Tor doesn't change any other layers of the OSI model either. Its just an incredibly obfuscated routing network that adds in layers of plausible deniability by making traffic that might be bound for you appear to be traffic bound anywhere else.
But yea, Tor does not encrypt things by default. You can poison the exit nodes and you can "corner" people and do traffic analysis of even encrypted traffic if you expect them to be a tor user. This does take a lot of work though and a lot of resources, but I'd imagine that a number of very fast nodes on most Tor nets are monitoring nodes used by governments and law enforcement.
There are no fast nodes on the TOR network.
And stop fucking counter-argue shit I havent said.
Tor data can easily be identified, not by the packet header, but rather by the pattern they send packets on, and the fact that it's exclusively TCP. Also shit-load of other telltale's..
Last edited by itsamemario on May-31-2012 at 09:37
May-31-2012 09:12
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
i really enjoyed Underground by Suelette Dreyfus. that's about all i know about hacking. my favourite part was the hacker that used to phreak (sp?) phone lines, and would call this one random dude in the US and demand his shovel back. did it for years. brilliant.
May-31-2012 09:18
Joss Weatherby
terrible silence
Registered: May 2008
Location: Whole Life Tour | Cascadia
quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
There are no fast nodes on the TOR network.
And stop fucking counter-argue shit I havent said.
Tor data can easily be identified, not by the packet header, but rather by the pattern they send packets on, and the fact that it's exclusively TCP.
How am I counter arguing shit you haven't said? You said tor date is easily identifiable, I said it is not.
Are you mentally retarded or something alfi? You say the most random ass shit. Still trying to figure out wtf you were on about in that PM you sent me like 3 months ago about copying something or someone...
Oh and a shit ton of stuff is primarily TCP. All web browsing is done via TCP, IMAP/POP/SMTP are all TCP... The only things that are really not TCP are control packets and UDP for streaming and games.
You said it was easily identifiable because it wasn't encrypted and wrote two paragraphs about it. I never said it was easily identifiable because it wasn't encrypted. I just said it was easily identifiable. Get it?
