TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- Producers thread
Pages (23): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »


Posted by narcism on Oct-26-2005 13:54:

Producers thread

for the sooks that dont want to post
here


Posted by Philby on Oct-26-2005 13:55:

haha

got angst?


Posted by Aesthetic on Oct-26-2005 23:45:

Sooks?


Posted by marsh on Oct-27-2005 23:41:

Wah-hah-hah-hah-haaaaaaah.....


Posted by jizza on Oct-29-2005 07:29:

hmmm i see all the real producers are too scared to step up. well hokay then. COP A JOCKFULL OF THIS:

http://s19.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=...8F23B540GCILZLE

nintendo's so hot right now.


Posted by eRRaTiK on Oct-29-2005 07:54:

Sneaker Pimp

LOL jizza what did you do to Ferry's masterpiece!!

...

yo AUTA producers, get yo asses entered in The Art of War Remix Contest, sponsored by Fiberlineaudio.com and Imagine Line. There are prizes to be won, and chix0rs to be sex0r'd*.

*ok maybe not, but there's davebegic


Posted by Philby on Oct-29-2005 08:24:

haha go jizza


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-04-2005 03:04:

hey guys been working on my tune heaps, an update is worth the download i hope..

www.davebegic.com/15oct_2.mp3


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-07-2005 02:42:

quote:
Originally posted by DaveBegic
www.davebegic.com/15oct_2.mp3


very nice mr begic.

the only thing id say is the peak needs a little more oomph. now, im not sure what to do to give it that oomph but im sure you do mainly i dont particularly like that each key of the melody falls exactly in time with the beat- a bit mundane.

otherwise, a top effort and looking fwd to finished product


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-07-2005 03:23:

Cheers man.. what is it you don't like? Can you send me a priv8 about it pls?


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-07-2005 04:19:

roger that begic. when i get home to the 1930s casio ill pm ya


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-07-2005 22:53:

thanks man. you're the only one who's really had any real negative feedback lately so i'd like to hear it. but it sounds like you want me to re-arrange alot.


Posted by DJ_Ballistic on Nov-08-2005 02:55:

quote:
Originally posted by DaveBegic
thanks man. you're the only one who's really had any real negative feedback lately so i'd like to hear it. but it sounds like you want me to re-arrange alot.



thats not true, i think its shit and u know why


BECAUSE I HATE YOU, WITH YOUR POOP MOUTH, ALL THE POOP COMIN OUT OF YOUR MOUTH


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-08-2005 03:00:

I'm sorry, I don't speak Spanish. What did you say?


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-08-2005 06:13:

lol.
pm sent begic.


Posted by Nyquist_Theorem on Nov-10-2005 12:02:

sounds good dave, only thing I might suggest is the little four-note trill that first appears two seconds in - once you start cranking the delay return up a bit (prob at :26 is where it becomes noticeable, and moreso on the subsequent ones) you can hear that the delay time is slightly off. assuming the delay times are set in milliseconds, just divide 60,000 by the bpm and that's the length of your quarter note in ms (sounds like a straight quarter note delay to me), so at your 133bpm that would make a quarter note 451.1ms. Doing this should also let you do some fun feedback loop stuff perfectly in sync, either off the tail end of the trill during the beginning as you come into the break, or even reversed and put in as a build up out of the breakdown (very Andy Moor).

If the delay time is supposed to be auto-calculated from the BPM, it doesn't appear to be reading the bpm properly, so chuck it into manual mode (if your delay supports delay time being input in ms - if not try to use one that does) and plug in 451.1ms and see how much fun the feedback becomes - even better if you can insert an eq or highpass filter into the delay's feedback loop as then you can re-emphasise a particular frequency band with each delay, like a tuned tape delay. Or, cut instead of boost the eq in the delay's feedback loop, so that subsequent echoes fade away by losing more and more off the bottom end (or maybe roll a bit off the top, too, so it appears to get more distant), instead of just fading away in amplitude. If you're after that kind of effect of course - might be a bit dubby.


Posted by DJ_Ballistic on Nov-10-2005 12:22:

nah i dont think thats it


Posted by OLi_A on Nov-10-2005 12:27:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Ballistic
nah i dont think thats it


sif you know anything about canadians


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-10-2005 22:48:

hey man, have to say thanks for giving me some pointers on the delay. i'd have to say im pretty sure at the moment it is synching with the host tempo so i'll give it a stab manually like you've suggested. actually finishing the tune this weekend so i'll have that done asap.

thanks again.

ps, lol nath.

quote:
Originally posted by Nyquist_Theorem
sounds good dave, only thing I might suggest is the little four-note trill that first appears two seconds in - once you start cranking the delay return up a bit (prob at :26 is where it becomes noticeable, and moreso on the subsequent ones) you can hear that the delay time is slightly off. assuming the delay times are set in milliseconds, just divide 60,000 by the bpm and that's the length of your quarter note in ms (sounds like a straight quarter note delay to me), so at your 133bpm that would make a quarter note 451.1ms. Doing this should also let you do some fun feedback loop stuff perfectly in sync, either off the tail end of the trill during the beginning as you come into the break, or even reversed and put in as a build up out of the breakdown (very Andy Moor).

If the delay time is supposed to be auto-calculated from the BPM, it doesn't appear to be reading the bpm properly, so chuck it into manual mode (if your delay supports delay time being input in ms - if not try to use one that does) and plug in 451.1ms and see how much fun the feedback becomes - even better if you can insert an eq or highpass filter into the delay's feedback loop as then you can re-emphasise a particular frequency band with each delay, like a tuned tape delay. Or, cut instead of boost the eq in the delay's feedback loop, so that subsequent echoes fade away by losing more and more off the bottom end (or maybe roll a bit off the top, too, so it appears to get more distant), instead of just fading away in amplitude. If you're after that kind of effect of course - might be a bit dubby.


Posted by First Strike on Nov-13-2005 06:27:

quote:
Originally posted by DaveBegic
hey guys been working on my tune heaps, an update is worth the download i hope..

www.davebegic.com/15oct_2.mp3


Nice track,

I like it, i think like pkcRAISTLIN said a bit more 'oomph' in the peaks would be good (could be the quality of the clip making it sound not 100% true i dont know).

Any way good track, keep up uthe good work, Look foward to hearing the completed version.


What did you use to make it ????


Posted by Aesthetic on Nov-13-2005 08:02:

Hi there mate, thanks for the comments. I've updated it since that clip and taken that one down due to some outside interest. Hopefully the final will be what you're after.

I used FL Studio v5, and a bunch of vst's for that.

Thanks

Dave


Posted by Nyquist_Theorem on Nov-13-2005 09:10:

quote:
Originally posted by DaveBegic
hey man, have to say thanks for giving me some pointers on the delay. i'd have to say im pretty sure at the moment it is synching with the host tempo so i'll give it a stab manually like you've suggested. actually finishing the tune this weekend so i'll have that done asap.

thanks again.


any time at all, dude, sounds like you're well on the right path already - can't wait to hear the final product!


Posted by eRRaTiK on Nov-14-2005 08:00:

we're due for many final products from dave and the oni0n fellow, imo.


Posted by Philby on Nov-14-2005 13:01:

thanks heaps matt, needed some more pick up material!!


Posted by Paddlepop on Nov-15-2005 13:09:

Hey everyone!!

I haven't posted here for a while but I used to.

I have been producing for quite some time and am now signed to Hard Kandy Records. I produce under 'NFX" and play quite a few Live Gigs around Melb. Next one is on the main stage VS Scott Alert at Advent*Jah.

My debut EP is out on Hard Kandy Records on CD (4 tracks) and the title track is on the Hard Kandy episode 4 CD.

My most recent achievment is that Alex Kidd and Dark By Design just completed a Remix of the title track "No Go, Go For Launch" which will be released on Vinyl early next year, bloody stoked at that!!!


Pages (23): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.